home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20041116-20060924
/
000128_fdc@columbia.edu_Tue Jul 19 11:06:23 2005.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2006-09-27
|
2KB
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!not-for-mail
From: Frank da Cruz <fdc@columbia.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: telnet to SCO
Date: 19 Jul 2005 15:06:08 GMT
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <slrnddq5n0.88j.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu>
References: <42dc3e99$0$2225$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org>
Reply-To: fdc@columbia.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sesame.cc.columbia.edu
X-Trace: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu 1121785568 17352 128.59.59.56 (19 Jul 2005 15:06:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@columbia.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jul 2005 15:06:08 GMT
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (SunOS)
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:15370
On 2005-07-18, als <als73@hotmail.com> wrote:
: I'll try to phrase this correctly :)
: I would like to telnet to a SCO sVr4 box, and get essentially the same
: interaction seen in a Linux Bash console. What (SCO) terminal type
: would be closest? I have tried to copy the Linux terminal definition
: for console, VT100, and a few others, but have had no success.
: Linux: C-Kermit 7.0.197, SCO: C-kermit 6.0.192
:
>From Windows, no problem, use Kermit 95 and its built-in SCOANSI emulator.
>From Linux, not quite so simple; see:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ckfaq.html#term
: On an semi-related note, I am curious why some file transfers run much
: faster than others (all text files). Low of about 18k, high about 88k.
:
There could be a thousand explanations. All else being equal, it's
not what you'd expect. So all else must not be equal :-)
- Frank